Your family genes are not your destiny.
In the most recent mega-study, researchers at King's College Birmingham, followed more than 13, 1000 pairs of twins over a period of 12 years and came up with a genetic and environmental hotspot map showing that the weighting given to genetics versus environment in your development can be strongly affected by your geographic site. At first blush, these findings sound fairly apparent. After all, basically the whole point of mother nature versus nurture to show that environment performs as much of an important role in development along with genetics? Not too, explain the researchers. Well-liked theory disagrees that all facets of development happen to be influenced simply by both genetics and environment. However , in line with the KCL group, exactly how much of the development is dependent upon genetics and how much is dependant upon environment might be largely caused by where you live.
Confused? I want to try to clarify.
Take, for instance , hay fever allergy. When a set of genetically identical baby twins were to have hay fever gene, after that their susceptibility to growing hay fever should be genetically equal. Place one set of mixed twins in a area with lots of pollen and the other set in a pollen-free region and you will find that only the pair of twins in the pollinated place will develop hay fever. In it lies the concept of the innate hot spot. An area with a large amount of pollen is known as a genetic hot spot for hay fever since people that happen to be genetically vunerable to hay fever will only obtain it in the pollinated region. Continue to confused? Therefore am I! All of this study says to me is the fact if you are genetically susceptible to responding to an environmental condition, the response will only seem if and when the environmental condition exists. Isn't that obvious?